Ann Curry

Something that has been bugging me lately.  Why are network reporters allowed to interview heads of state of hostile nations.  Diane Sawyer is another case.  These “interviews” are basically propaganda sessions for these hostile nations.  Shouldn’t professionals from the state department be doing this instead of reporters.  It doesn’t help that Ann Curry and Diane Sawyer don’t come across as very intelligent at times.


~ by novamiddleman on May 7, 2007.

3 Responses to “Ann Curry”

  1. Why are network reporters allowed to interview heads of state of hostile nations?

    “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; of abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

    That’s pretty much why.

  2. I fully support freedom of the press.

    One could say that I don’t have the highest intellecutual respect for the two people I mentioned :-p along with many other MSM individuals. Sixty minutes often asks questions to hostile leaders which I wonder if they are actually doing more harm than good.

    There was another show I saw that had an interview with Osama Bin Laden and I was thinking. 1. Why would he grant an interview unless for propaganda. 2. If a reporter can get an interview why isn’t he dead.

  3. I have also often wondered how reporters get up so close to these dangerous people.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: